All writers are created differently.
We can sit in the same classes, but each of us holds different stories in our hearts and minds. Each of us has our own voice. Each of us has our own process or lack there of when we work on our books.
Thank the Lord we are all so different or we wouldn’t have a variety of stories and books filling the shelves and internet. But no matter how different our process or our stories, there is a rhyme and reason to structuring our novels.
I just got back from the Deep Thinkers Retreat through My Book Therapy where we focused on story and structure. Both Susie and Rachel write fantastic books. Both have different processes. As I sat listening to how they process and plan, I realized that I fall in the middle of their styles. I’m a planning pantser. Like how I just created my own title there?
Planners need an outline, a very specific structure. The story is mostly written before they begin. They just have to weave it. Pantsers don’t like the structure. They have it all in their head and heart and want to sit down and write however the story leads. There is a beauty to both. There is also a danger to both when we overcompensate. It is important to focus on story structure. It makes the story cohesive, focused, and strong. There is also a beauty to allowing yourself the flexibility for letting the scene change.
Historically, I write a very brief outline, focus on some character development and personality, and then hit the page. Often the structure would overwhelm me and make me feel boxed in, so I would toss my hands in the air and just start writing because there I find the freedom to breath.
After this retreat, I have realized I need the structure, I need to plan. I know how and have the tools to accomplish this in a manner that makes my character and plot sing. Then I need to use that to allow the words to just flow.
So where do you fall on the wide spectrum of writers? If you are a planner, plot that thing out. Know the ins and outs of your character. My boss always says to “plan to be flexible,” and I would echo that with your writing. No person, place, or thing is without the ability to change, even if only a little. No matter what you plan, the story will probably change as you write. Enjoy the process!
And for all my pantser friends out there, own it and enjoy! I would encourage taking a little time to make sure it all connects and then rock that flexibility.
I am discovering that I don’t need to follow the process of other writers. They are succeeding with their writing not because they all write the same, but because they have owned their voice, story, and process. Perfection isn’t the end goal. I would argue that connection with reader and excellence in the story is more important. However it works best for you, get that story on the page, write from the voice that God gave you, and do it to the best of your ability as unto the Lord and not unto man.
Are you a pantser or a planner? What works best for you?
8 Replies to “Pantser or Planner?”
Planner. But I usually use the word Lister. Because that’s the way it is with my whole day. Yesterday I copied the entire book and put sticky notes on what needed changing, because I needed to see it in tactile form. Sticky notes in different colors are my friends.
Oh I like that description!
I’m a pantser by nature but I’m forcing myself to actually plan for a change. It feels good to have an outline versus figuring it out as I go along.
I’m with ya!
Definitely a pantser that thinks she plans:)
Mostly I fly by my faith! God takes care of it:)
Oh such a good description!
I’ve started calling myself a Puzzler. Because I have an outline, I conquer the beginning, and then I write chapters out of order. One here, one there — not sequentially. It’s like putting down the corners and big pieces of a puzzle, after which I fill in the gaps. I think this is a weird way to write a book, but I finally admitted that’s my process. So I’m going with it! It’s a bit of planning, a bit of pantsing, and a lot of puzzling.
Proof that all writers are different. I LOVE this!
Comments are closed.